RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05025
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her Reentry (RE) code of 4I (Serving on Control Roster) be changed
to allow her to reenter the military.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
When she was discharged from the Air Force, the control roster
action had already expired.
In support of her request, the applicant provides copies of her AF
IMT 1058, Unfavorable Information File Action, and DD Form 214,
Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 9 Jan 07, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force.
According to documentation provided by the applicant, on 23 Feb
12, she was placed on the control roster for driving under the
influence and excessive speeding.
On 30 Apr 12, the applicants supervisor non-recommended her for
reenlistment. On the same date, the applicants commander non-
selected her for reenlistment. In doing so, the commander
indicated the applicant was not selected for retention under the
Fiscal Year 2012 Enlisted Date of Separation (DOS) Rollback
Program for being on the control roster and for being
administratively demoted.
On 4 May 12, the applicant appealed the Selective Reenlistment
Program (SRP) decision and on 22 May 12, the Appellate Authority
denied the applicants appeal.
On 29 Sep 12, the applicant received an honorable discharge, and
was credited with 5 years, 8 months, and 21 days of active
service.
On 4 Apr 14, AFPC/DPSOA informed the applicant that after a
thorough review of her personnel records, they discovered that her
RE Code of 4I was incorrect and should be 2X (First-term, second-
term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment
under the SRP) based on her non-selection for reenlistment.
AFPC/DPSOY will provide a corrected DD Form 214.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial indicating there is no indication the
applicants commander was without authority in placing the
applicant on the control roster nor was there enough evidence to
support changing the RE code. During the time the applicant was
placed on the control roster, the FY12 Enlisted DOS Rollback
(Phase II) Program commenced. In accordance with Field Message,
Personnel Services Delivery Memorandum (PSDM) 12-37, FY12 Enlisted
DOS Rollback (Phase II) Program, dated 20 Apr 12, airmen are
eligible if they are on a control roster, are serving suspended
punishment under Article 15, or show lost time in the current
enlistment. There is no evidence the applicant was affected by
this program; however, based on her 29 Sep 12 DOS and the
timeframe of the control roster, it is safe to assume the
applicant was affected by this program. If affected, her RE code
should reflect 2X versus 4I.
The DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 18 Apr 14 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of DPSIM and adopt its rationale as the basis for
our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error
of injustice. We note that AFPC/DPSOA has determined that the
applicants RE Code of 4I was incorrect and should be 2X based on
her non-selection for reenlistment and AFPC/DPSOY will correct her
records administratively. Therefore, aside from the
administrative correction noted above, we find no basis to
recommend granting relief beyond that rendered administratively.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2013-05025 in Executive Session on 28 Aug 14, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 2 Oct 13, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Available Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 26 Feb 14, w/atch.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 Apr 14.
2
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00165
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00165 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to 1M (Eligible to reenlist, second-term or career airmen not yet...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03463
He was notified the control roster action automatically placed him on the FY13 Rollback Program. He contacted the Separations office at Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA) Randolph to correct this issue, but they were unable to manually change separation code on DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, because the automatic LGH separation code was loaded in their system. On 15 Jul 13, the applicant was separated under the FY13 DOS Rollback Program, with a RE code of 2X;...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01103
On 23 May 12, his supervisor signed the AF IMT 418, Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) Consideration for Airmen in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve, indicating he was not recommending him for reenlistment due to his duty performance and multiple disciplinary issues. On 14 May 12, his supervisor presented him with an AF IMT 1058, Unfavorable Information File Action, notifying him that he intended to place him on the control roster for his duty performance and multiple disciplinary...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05688
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05688 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code 4I which denotes Serving on Control Roster be changed. On 18 Apr 07, he was honorably discharged from active duty with an RE code of 4I and narrative reason for separation of Completion of Required Active Service. He...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04992
On 9 May 2012, the applicant submitted an additional response to his denial of reenlistment and demotion action because he indicated that he just received the ROI. On 19 September 2012, by authority of the Secretary of the Air Force, his 3 August 2012 request for redress filed under Article 138 was denied as the actions taken by the command were determined to be appropriate to the circumstances. The applicants discharge was correctly administered on the basis of his RE code of 2X (denied...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03778
In accordance with the Date of Separation (DOS) Rollback Program, the applicant was honorably discharged on 27 July 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (Completion of Required Active Service). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that since the applicant was discharged under the DOS Rollback Program and was serving on the Control Roster, his separation code of JBK...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02502
His records be corrected to show that he is now and was promotion eligible during the time he was placed on a Control Roster. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. AFPC/DPSOA recommends closing the case, since the applicant's record currently reflects his requested actions and they do not have the history, nor are they the OPR for control roster actions; however, based on the information provided the previous RE code 4I would have been a result of...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02503
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02503 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The reentry (RE) code of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to allow her to reenter the military. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03589
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03589 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program) and separation code of JBK (less than six years of active service), be changed to allow...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01220
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01220 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the selective reenlistment program (SRP)) and separation program designator (SPD) code of JBK (expiration of term of service) be changed...